Jump to Navigation


Libya and the Moral Language of War

Contrary to the notion that U.S. military action must be predicated on American strategic interests, President Barack Obama has said that the United States’ only motive for intervening in the Libyan civil war was to protect civilians there. Stephen L. Carter, Yale Law School professor and author of The Violence of Peace: America’s Wars in the Age of Obama, argues that though Obama campaigned as the “peace” candidate, he believes that intervening in human rights conflicts is a legitimate use of military force.  Referencing St. Augustine’s “just war” theory, Carter suggests Obama may be on the right track, and argues the need for a public discussion about what constitutes the right and just use of power. View Carter’s full interview remarks in this 10-minute video archived on the website of Religion & Ethics NewsWeekly.  In addition, view a five-minute Religion & Ethics NewsWeekly news article on Carter’s perspective. 



Tips on Thriving with Musical Staff

One thing is certain: church music ministry is a minefield these days. We are a visible presence, and it seems that...

Significance of Storytelling

“We Survive by Telling Stories” by Carolina Hinojosa-Cisneros Generational storytelling is a history book. It...

New Organ Can Mimic the Sound of an Ojibwe Flute

Early in the project, church leaders asked the Casavant sound engineers to build a set of pipes that could mimic the...


Mon, Jul 9, 2018 - 09:00 am
Race is a reality that profoundly affects congregational life throughout the United States, and there is a growing desire among...

Popular Tools

Browse dozens of topics and see responses from a major national survey of congregations.



Widget provided by: