Jump to Navigation


Challenging Religious Freedom In The Modern Age

Historically, most court cases alleging abridgment of the constitutional right to the free exercise of religion have come from minority faiths whose practices have seemed alien to the dominant American culture. In response, state and federal courts have had to interpret the meaning of “free exercise” to determine where compelling state interests can curtail religious expression. In a working paper housed as a downloadable PDF on the website of the Association of Religion Data Archives, a source for the highest-quality information and data on American and international religion, Robert R. Martin and Roger Finke of Pennsylvania State University review milestone Supreme Court decisions affecting religious freedom from the last century, then focus on decisions between 1981 and 2011 to determine how the adoption and rejection of legislated tests that try to quantify state interests have affected the outcome of minority religion legal challenges.





FULLER dialogues on Race and Identity

“We are joined at the site of the dirt. And the dirt is our kin. From dust and to dust we will return. We are of the...

Gun Safety Advocate

After her mother was killed in the 2015 Charleston church shooting, the Rev. Sharon Risher became an evangelist for a...

Billy Graham 1918-2018

  Billy Graham was perhaps the most significant religious figure of the 20th century, and the organizations and...


Tue, Feb 27, 2018 - 06:00 pm

Popular Tools

Compare Yourself
How do you compare to the rest of the U.S. population?
Religious Preference:

Widget provided by: